Este envío tiene varios votos negativos.
Asegúrate antes de menear
De acuerdo a los resultados preliminares del experimento sueco que lleva ya dos años en proceso, los costes superan los beneficios. La ciudad no continuará con el plan de manera permanente.
|
etiquetas: jornada , suecia , laboral
“It’s associated with higher costs, absolutely,” said Daniel Bernmar, a local left-wing politician responsible for running the municipality’s elderly care. “It’s far too expensive to carry out a general shortening of working hours within a reasonable time frame.”
Peeeeero:
Still, Bernmar says he’d like to see more studies into whether an abbreviated working day could also result in long-term gains for society as a whole. One argument is that it could allow people employed in labor-intensive professions to extend their working life.
“I personally believe in shorter working hours as a long-term solution,” he said.
Al Ayuntamiento, digamos, le ha salido mas caro, lo que no quiere decir que sea malo en general. Obviamente, para Bloomberg lo que cuenta es que sea rentable o no, no tanto otros factores (“The richer we become, the more we need to take advantage of that wealth in other ways than through a newer car or higher consumption.")
Lo de antes eran solo pruebas de concepto.
Working hours were shortened to 6 for the 68 nurses at the Svartedalen old people’s home, who got to keep the same salary level. To cover for the reduction, the city had to hire 17 extra staff at a cost of about 12 million kronor ($1.3 million)