La semana pasada, hubo manifestaciones en Londres, Berlín y Los Ángeles contra las medidas de confinamiento, y lo que se notó fue que atrajeron tanto a los seguidores de la New Age como a los grupos de extrema derecha. Ya he escrito antes sobre esta superposición – cómo tanto la Nueva Era como la extrema derecha (y la extrema izquierda) tienen querencia por las teorías de conspiración.
|
etiquetas: hippies nazis , nueva era , extrema derecha , trump , hitler
El nazismo (el fascismo no) tiene vertientes muy "esotéricas". Prácticamente todo neonazi cree en alguna forma de "espiritualidad". Mientras los rusos avanzaban por el este de Alemania, por ejemplo, una de las principales acitividades que eran llevadas a cabo por las SS era la "purificación" de la tradición masónica.
youtu.be/fhB06m_akZg
Ahora estamos todos mezclados.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=d8QY_y40aCE #Cosas_nazis
Por eso no me sorprenden noticias cómo está en absoluto.
A cagar.
And Adolf Hitler is just a stupid person, uneducated, unsophisticated. But he has something in him that the professors were lacking, that intelligent people were lacking, that the Martin Heideggers were lacking. He has something in him which no intelligent person can have: he has absolute certainty. He is idiotic -- but he can say things with no ifs and no buts; he can make statements as if he knows. He is a madman, but his madness had great impact. It changed the whole course of human history.
It is not a surprise that the Germans became so interested and impressed by him. They were intelligent people, some of the most intelligent people on the earth, and intelligence always brings confusion. That is the secret of Adolf Hitler's success. Intelligence brings confusion and confusion brings trembling, fear; one knows not where to go, what to do, and one starts looking for a leader. One starts searching for somebody who can say things with absoluteness, who can assert categorically."
OSHO
Source - Osho Book "The Book of Wisdom"
"A man should live intelligently -- that's all. Then whatever he does is his responsibility. It happens that even great intellectuals are not living intelligently.
Adolf Hitler was just a retarded person. But power...
We have been brought up to follow the powerful -- the father, the mother, the teacher, the priest, the God. Essentially we have been told that whoever has the power is right: "Might is right." And you have to follow it. It is simple because it needs no intelligence. It is simple because you can never be told that it was your responsibility, that whatever happened was your responsibility.
In all the armies around the world only one thing is taught through years of training, and that is obedience. In Germany, in the second world war, there were good people, but they were heads of concentration camps. They were good fathers, good husbands, good friends. Nobody could have conceived -- watching them in their families, with their friends, in the club -- that these people are burning thousands of Jews every day.
And they were not feeling guilty at all, because it is only an order from above. And that is their whole training, that you have to follow the order. It has become part of their blood and their bones and their marrow. When the order comes, obedience is the only way. This is how man has lived up to now, and that's why I say obedience is one of the greatest crimes, because all other crimes are born out of it. It deprives you of intelligence, it deprives you of decisiveness, it deprives you of responsibility. It destroys you as an individual. It converts you into a robot.
Hence I am all for disobedience. But disobedience is not just against obedience. Disobedience is above obedience and the so-called disobedience described in the dictionaries. Disobedience is simply the assertion of your intelligence: "I take the responsibility, and I will do everything that feels right to my heart, to my being. And I will not do anything that goes against my intelligence."
OSHO
Source - Osho Book "Beyond Psychology"
Falacia de confundir una parte (pequeñísima) con el todo.
c/c #29
Esas citas, son claramente críticas.
You say you'll change the constitution
Well you know
We'd all love to change your head
You tell me it's the institution
Well you know
You'd better free your mind instead
If you go carrying pictures of Chairman Mao
You ain't gonna make it with anyone anyhow
Don't you know it's gonna be? Alright
Aparte de usar los restos de los reactores civiles, se usan porque tienen un periodo de desintegración mas alto consiguiendo energia durante mas años, pero obteniendo menos potencia.
danielmarin.naukas.com/2011/11/28/la-energia-nuclear-en-misiones-espac
danielmarin.naukas.com/2011/03/14/sondas-nucleares-de-la-nasa/
Adoradores de Odín y de una tradición europea que la heredan los europeos de sangre y no tiene ni una pizca de homosexualidad
O sea, si construimos una nave para ir a algún planeta interesante de algún sistema planetario lejano, necesitaríamos una buena carga de uranio para poder funcionar durante el viaje, si lo gastamos ahora...
Otra opción sería tomar átomos de plomo, y con una pistola de neutrones convertirles en uranio, pero creo que es muy ineficiente.
Por tu última frase entiendo que te gusta el tema, pero no estás en el ajo
cc #56
In February 2013, a small amount of 238Pu was successfully produced by Oak Ridge's High Flux Isotope Reactor and on December 22, 2015, they reported the production of 50 grams (1.8 ounces) of 238Pu
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plutonium-238#Production
rps.nasa.gov/about-rps/about-plutonium-238/
Lo de que combustible se usara en las futuras misiones, pues ni idea, había unos proyectos con los "ion-drive" para tener un impulso constante y mantenible sin tener que llevar demasiado combustible, y luego estaban investigando motores con aceleracion continua, que te toca llevar mucho combustible, pero sin una aceleracion continua los viajes interestelares no son factibles.
El marxismo nace decimonónimo, si quieres, pero tiene en sí la previsión de contradicciones y su superación por medios científicos (tesis/antitesis/síntesis).
Sin HdP serian maravillosos desde el comunismo al capitalismo pasando por el anarquismo.